Using Microservices to Design Patient-facing Research Software

With a significant amount of software now being developed for use in patient-facing studies, there is a pressing need to consider how to design this software effectively in order to support the needs of both researchers and patients. We posit that a microservice architecture—which offers a large amount of flexibility for development and deployment, while at the same time ensuring certain quality attributes, such as scalability, are present—provides an effective mechanism for designing such software. To explore this proposition, in this work we show how the paradigm has been applied to the design of CONSULT, a decision support system that provides autonomous support to stroke patients and is characterised by its use of a data-backed AI reasoner. We discuss the impact that the use of this software architecture has had on the teams developing CONSULT and measure the performance of the system produced. We show that the use of microservices can deliver software that is able to facilitate both research and effective patient interactions. However, we also conclude that the impact of the approach only goes so far, with additional techniques needed to address its limitations.10.13039/501100000266-UK Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) (Grant Number: EP/P010105/1

Providing Explanations via the EQR Argument Scheme

This demo paper outlines the EQR argument scheme (AS) structure and deploys its instantiations to convey explanations using a chatbot

Argumentation Schemes for Clinical Decision Support

This paper demonstrates how argumentation schemes can be used in decision support systems that help clinicians in making treatment decisions. The work builds on the use of computational argumentation, a rigorous approach to reasoning with complex data that places strong emphasis on being able to justify and explain the decisions that are recommended. The main contribution of the paper is to present a novel set of specialised argumentation schemes that can be used in the context of a clinical decision support system to assist in reasoning about what treatments to offer. These schemes provide a mechanism for capturing clinical reasoning in such a way that it can be handled by the formal reasoning mechanisms of formal argumentation. The paper describes how the integration between argumentation schemes and formal argumentation may be carried out, sketches how this is achieved by an implementation that we have created, and illustrates the overall process on a small set of case studies

On the Complexity of Determining Defeat Relations Consistent with Abstract Argumentation Semantics

Typically in abstract argumentation, one starts with arguments and a defeat relation, and applies some semantics in order to determine the acceptability status of the arguments. We consider the converse case where we have knowledge of the acceptability status of arguments and want to identify a defeat relation that is consistent with the known acceptability data – the σ-consistency problem. Focusing on complete semantics as underpinning the majority of the major semantic types, we show that the complexity of determining a defeat relation that is consistent with some set of acceptability data is highly dependent on how the data is labelled. The extension-based 2-valued σ-consistency problem for complete semantics is revealed as NP-complete, whereas the labelling-based 3-valued σ-consistency problem is solvable within polynomial time. We then present an informal discussion on application to grounded, stable, and preferred semantics.</jats:p

EQRbot: A chatbot delivering EQR argument-based explanations

Recent years have witnessed the rise of several new argumentation-based support systems, especially in the healthcare industry. In the medical sector, it is imperative that the exchange of information occurs in a clear and accurate way, and this has to be reflected in any employed virtual systems. Argument Schemes and their critical questions represent well-suited formal tools for modeling such information and exchanges since they provide detailed templates for explanations to be delivered. This paper details the EQR argument scheme and deploys it to generate explanations for patients' treatment advice using a chatbot (EQRbot). The EQR scheme (devised as a pattern of Explanation-Question-Response interactions between agents) comprises multiple premises that can be interrogated to disclose additional data. The resulting explanations, obtained as instances of the employed argumentation reasoning engine and the EQR template, will then feed the conversational agent that will exhaustively convey the requested information and answers to follow-on users' queries as personalized Telegram messages. Comparisons with a previous baseline and existing argumentation-based chatbots illustrate the improvements yielded by EQRbot against similar conversational agents

Applying Metalevel Argumentation Frameworks to Support Medical Decision Making

UK Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), grant #EP/P010105/1